Movie #1844 "Little Women" (2019) there are 7 recognized film versions of this classic novel (see below for a ranking by Entertainment) , and I think this is the most well thought out one and therefore the best one of the ones I have seen (all but three -- the disqualified one, #5 and #3 below) There's so much that is wonderful here --- the acting, the sisters' relationship, the warmth and generosity and empathy of Marmee, the opposite of those qualities shown in the aunt (played here beautifully by Meryl Streep) and the exuberant rendition of Laurie --- lovely Laurie --- who loves all the March sisters, esp. Jo and eventually Amy. The photography is sumptuous, the costumes are drop dead gorgeous, the story isn't told in a straight time line to keep us guessing what will happen next, even if we know this glorious book from beginning to end.....My heart sank when Jo turned Laurie down when I watched the scene here, just like it did when I read it as a little girl--- And then it sank even lower when the film reveals whom Laurie ends up with (again I was reminded of the devastation on the young reader I was when I first read this book). I really loved this rendition, but with one complaint --- Professor Bhaer. I didn't like the casting and I didn't like how little he was in this film. The Winona Ryder version was shown on t.v. this past week, and I watched just a bit, but the bit I watched reminded me how wonderfully that relationship was developed --- it seemed Gerwig wasn't interested in that relationship in this version and I wonder if she, like me, secretly doesn't want Jo to end up with him. I can remember NOT liking Professor Bhaer when I read it the first time --- I wanted Jo to remain free and independent, and so I resented any relinquishing of that Jo spirit to any professor bhaer--- and in some of the versions below (like Paul Lukas and Katherine Hepburn (who in some ways embodies Jo's spirit the best to me so I disagree with the writer below who says she was miscast) , I accepted it, but this one, I did not. There's a moment in this film where he leaves after meeting the March family, and Jo looks and sees him go, and then turns back to her family and they all just stare at her and get her to admit she has feelings for him ---I know that Alcott's ending was about to go in the inevitable direction of her going after him, but in my heart, I wanted the story not to go that way ---- I wanted her to be happy and NOT marry off her lead character! But that's not the ending Alcott wrote, i know. And so did Gerwig. But we can dream, can't we? Hah! I'd give this film 4.5 out of 5, and it will remain the best rendition of this book to me (and to others, I bet).
“LITTLE WOMEN” 2019 2 hrs. 15 mins
Four sisters come of age in America in the aftermath of the Civil War.
Stars: z Saoirse Ronan (Joe) , Florence Pugh (amy), Meryl Streep, (Aunt March) , Emma Watson (meg), Laura Dern (Marmee), Timothy Chalamet (Laurie)
Entertainment article by Mary Sollosi
The March sisters on screen
With the Christmas release of Greta Gerwig's new adaptation of of Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women, we find ourselves overcome with March sister madness — but this isn’t the first time the proto-feminist bildungsroman has hit the big or small screen. See our countdown to the greatest adaptation of the novel ahead…
DISQUALIFIED: Little Women (2018)
We have admittedly only seen clips of Clare Niederpruem’s 2018 adaptation, but we find the decision to take the tale out of its Civil War setting and place it in the present day utterly baffling. So, for undermining the integrity of the novel, denying us the pleasure of period costumes, and forcing in really awkward soldier-Skype scenes where there ought to have been lovely letter-readings, we hereby disqualify this recent entry into the Little Women cinematic tradition from being ranked.(Lee Thompson as Marmee , really only recognizable one in the cast)
6. Little Women (1978 miniseries)
We cannot even begin to describe why the 1978 miniseries ranks last, because there is not one thing about it that is not as wrong as can possibly be. There is nothing good to say about this adaptation. The costumes are ridiculous, the ’70s hair is outrageous, every single character is miscast (Professor Bhaer is played by, of all people, William Shatner), and the script is nightmarishly bad. Please, let’s just move on to the next one and try our best to forget about this. (Meredith Baxter as Meg, Susan Dey as Jo, Eve Plumb as Beth, Dorothy McGuire as Marmee, Greer Garson as Aunt March.
5. Little Women (1949 movie)
Mervyn LeRoy’s 1949 version of the story lacks any of the specificity that makes Alcott’s novel compelling, particularly in its presentation of Jo (June Allyson) as an irritating cliché of a spitfire screwball heroine rather than a genuine original. The film’s saving grace, however, is Elizabeth Taylor as a perfect Amy. (Janet Leigh as Meg, Margaret O’Brien as Beth, Peter Lawford as Laurie, Mary Astor as Marmee, Rossano Brazzi as Prof. Bhaer)
4. Little Women (1933 movie)
Nobody would ever accuse Louisa May Alcott of producing a cold, hard book in Little Women, but George Cukor really laid on the schmaltz in this pre-Code take on the story (without any pre-Code sexiness), which stars four women clearly in their mid-20s as the teenaged March sisters (including a miscast Katharine Hepburn as Jo). However! The legendary director managed to inject a little more fun into it than Mervyn LeRoy did in his remake of this version 16 years later, and what’s Little Women without a little schmaltz?. (Joan Bennett as Amy, Jean Parker as Beth, Frances Dee as Meg, and Paul Lukas as Prof. Bhaer)
3. Little Women (2018 miniseries)
The new miniseries, starring Maya Hawke (in her screen debut) as Jo, dutifully checks off the lengthy novel’s greatest hits: the burned manuscript, the ice, the limes, Meg’s solo trip to a fancy party and consequent unnecessary guilt — and looks beautiful. The heavy-handed script and overly theatrical performances, especially from the younger cast, prevent it from being a truly great adaptation, but it’s got charm and sweetness to spare. (angela Lansbury was Aunt March)
2. Little Women (1994 movie)
It's a classic for a reason. Winona Ryder makes a wonderfully winsome Jo, Claire Danes an impossibly sweet Beth, and Christian Bale a perfectly charming Laurie in the beloved film which reigned as the unquestionable best for 25 years. Gillian Armstrong's faithful and straightforward adaptation captures much of the magic of the novel, from the authentic intimacy shared by these March sisters to the warmth of this incarnation of their beloved home. Amid a collection of big old drafty New England houses, this Little Women really is a castle in the sky. (Mary Wickes as Aunt March, Kirsten Dunst, young Amy, Susan Sarandon as Marmee)
1. Little Women (2019 movie)
In her second directorial effort, Greta Gerwig didn't just adapt the text of a novel, but the book in all its context, investigating the woman and the world that it came from. In doing so, she created the most inventive cinematic rendition yet — while also being more true to the essence of Little Women than a more straightforward retelling could ever be. The inspired casting of Saoirse Ronan as Jo, Timothée Chalamet as Laurie, and Meryl Streep as Aunt March certainly helped, and Florence Pugh, as the most layered and lovable Amy we've ever seen, practically steals the movie. Vital, romantic, and brilliantly modern, Gerwig's film brings Louisa May Alcott into the 21st century, which is clearly where she belonged all along.