Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Movie #1369 ......................."The Trouble with Spies"

Movie #1369 "The Trouble with Spies" --- this blog will be short and sweet --- don't see this; it is a waste of your time.  It isn't worth the time or effort.  Yes, Donald Sutherland is in it, but watch "Dirty Dozen" or "Mash" where he is super better, and don't bother with this one.  Silly plot, incapable actors.....the music was the best part of the movie.  So dated.  2 stars out of 5.

"TROUBLE WITH SPIES"     1987       PG-13         1 hour and 31 minutes


George Trent, a British spy, has gone incommunicado in Ibiza.   Appleton Porter (Donald Sutherland) is sent to find out what happened to Trent.  Porter settles into a small hotel with several busybody guests. He probes them for information about Trent, their former neighbor. Meanwhile, the spy survives several attempts on his life as he attempts to solve the mystery.

Director:

 

Writers:

 ,   (novel) (as Marc Lovell) 


The Trouble with Spies (1987)

PG-13 |  | ActionAdventureComedy | 4 December 1987 (USA)
The Trouble with Spies Poster

Movie #1368 ........................."Women Who Kill"

Movie #1368 "Women Who Kill" I found not very funny at all.  Pretty vulgar, in fact, but maybe it's just me.  I sat through the entire Amy Shumer segment, and she's okay to me, but I wish she would widen the topics that she discusses, but then the middle two comic weren't very funny at all.  The last one was a bit more talented but then she was fixated on male bashing as well.   So yes, these are mostly talented female comedians, and yes, it's difficult to be one, but enough of the male bashing, in my opinion.  There is so much more out there to make fun of and get comedy out of..... I give it 2 stars out of 5.

"WOMEN WHO KILL"     2012         1 hour and 12 minutes


Top comediennes Amy Schumer, Rachel Feinstein, Nikki Glaser and Marina Franklin join up in New York City for one hilarious night of stand-up comedy. From racism to pregnancy, nothing is off limits as each comic delivers her own sharp point-of-view.

Movie #1367 ........................."Love Me or Leave Me"

Movie #1467 "Love Me or Leave Me" was a disappointment to me.  Oh, I loved all the Doris Day numbers because I always loved her voice, and I usually like James Cagney movies, but I found him so verbally abusive in this, I had to turn it off for a while.  He seemed like a broken record, and I could see no reason why Miss Day would do anything for that creep!  Much less marry him.  But evidently others did, because he was nominated, and so was the script and it won!  But I just found it too depressing and went away from it for about 20 minutes, and then watched the last scenes.  Too much shouting, too much abuse -- I don't really recommend it to you, unless you want to see some slam bang singing by Miss Day, who is the one who should have been nominated.  I give it a 3 out of 5 stars.

"LOVE ME OR LEAVE ME" 1955        


Nightclub singer Ruth Etting (Doris Day) tries to keep her secret romance with a musician under wraps in this dramatic musical based on the life story of the 1930s singer. Etting is controlled by Martin "The Gimp" Snyder (James Cagney), who builds a nightclub and makes Etting its star. Snyder catches Etting with musician Johnny (Cameron Mitchell) and goes to prison for trying to kill him, leaving Ruth to continue performing in Snyder's nightclub.

Monday, August 28, 2017

Movie #1366 ........................."Starter for 10"

Movie #1366 "Starter for 10" has a title which refers to a university academic challenge quiz that is televised in the U.K., and it's the goal of James McAvoy's character since he was a little kid watching the show with his dad to be on it.  And since his dad's death, he's wanted to be on it to still make his dad proud.  So he goes to school with a huge passion for knowledge, leaving his nonacademic home friends (James Cordon and Dominic Cooper) behind.  Once at college, he meets a lot of what you'd expect to find at a university (drinkers, nerds, oddballs, jocks, etc.)  but thinks he finds his niche when he shows up for academic challenge quiz kids, led by merciless Benedict Cumberbatch who is out for blood since he himself lost the title for the team last year but is now the self-imposed leader (there are only 5 people that show up. They only need 4, so McAvoy is the sub --- he still shows up because he has fallen in lust for the blonde bombshell (who happens to be a whizkid at drama (she's a to-be actress).  As the story progresses, McAvoy is torn between two smart women; the other is  very passionate for tons of causes and also very smart (Rebecca Hall).  He also struggles to get through his first year of college trying to find where he fits in,  dealing with matters of the heart, and trying to decide how much of his life he wants to dedicate to academics.  This was a lot of fun to watch these up and coming actors (who all seem to be hooked up with Xmen, star wars, star trek kind of films now).  I highly recommend it, and esp. to students on the way to college.  It shows more the academic option of college, rather than just the party life....... I give it 5 out of 5.

"STARTER FOR 10"      2006        1 hour and 36 minutes     PG-13


As student Brian Jackson navigates through his freshman year at England's prestigious Bristol University, he develops a crush on a winsome coed and tries to win her heart by scoring a victory on the "University Challenge" quiz show.
Cast: James McAvoy, Alice Eve, Rebecca Hall , James Cordon, Dominic Cooper.  Benedict Cumberbatch

Director:  Tim Vaughan (director of some of the episodes of "Victoria" and "The Royals")

Friday, August 25, 2017

Movie #1365 ........................."Magic Mike"

Movie #1365 "Magic Mike"  -- I had a room full of women who hadn't seen this film, so tonight we streamed it through netflix, and it wasn't bad.  Dave and I had just seen "Logan Lucky" by Soderbergh the other night starring Chatum, and Dave hadn't seen him in everything, so he watched the opening and then left the room so I'm thinking he wouldn't recommend it, but then again, it isn't really made for men, is it?  That's what bothered me about the way the film was offered to moviegoers --- I wasn't about to go to a theatre and scream and yell when the strip scenes were going on --- But ever since it came out, I was curious to see a movie on this subject in the hands of such a well respected director and cast.  McConaughey never fails to surprise me -- he is your next Al Pacino, chewing up the scenery -- he loves these off kilter characters that he sometimes gets to play, and his enthusiasm pulls viewers in --- Channing Tatum is very accomplished in dancing, and since this is supposedly HIS story, somewhat, it was fun to watch what he can do dance wise and acting wise.  And Matthew BoHmer is always a treat since one of my favorite shows "White Collar" came to an end.  The story was predictable, but it had some raw energy that offered a few surprises along the way.  Music is good, too, in this cautionary tale (theme came through loud and clear).  I'd give it 3 out of 5 stars.

"MAGIC MIKE"     2012      RATED R      1 HOUR AND 50 MINS

Veteran male stripper Magic Mike introduces a new dancer known as the Kid to the pleasures -- and perils --- of their profession.

Starring:  Channing Tatum, Alex Pettyfer, Matthew McConaughey, Olivia Munn
Director:  Steven Soderbergh
Genres:  Comedies, Dramas, Showbiz Dramas





Movie #1364 ........................."The Glass Castle"

Movie #1364 "The Glass Castle" --- this is a tough one to write a blog on for me for several reasons.  One is that this is one of my favorite books; i.e., if someone were to say that he/she has never read a book he/she enjoys, I would say, "Have you tried reading 'Glass Castle'"?  Since everyone knows books are usually better than movies (with very few exceptions, like the book "Jaws"), you shouldn't be surprised that I liked reading the book much better.  So that makes it difficult to "like" any rendition of a book that is cherished.  But when you research the differences between this book and its movie, you will find that there ARE things changed, but that the author was on the set every day and she says that the movie is even closer to what happened than the book...........hmmm.  I've been thinking about this film ever since the movie ended.  My first reaction to the end of the movie was that I felt it didn't get the dad right at all.  I didn't remember Rex being so abusive in the book, or at least there were more redeeming moments in the book that showed off his intelligence, his passion which he passed on to his daughter who loved and trusted him, and his love for Jeanette (the narrator and author of the book).  I felt Woody Harrelson had ruined it somewhat with his interpretation --- I hadn't read the lines that Rex said to be as angry as Woody delivered them --- but then, if you watch the credits and see the real Rex speaking, the anger and big mouthiness were there.  So I decided that I think how you feel about this movie depends on how you interpret the Rex character and the mother --- are they abusive, or negligent?  When I read the book, I felt that they were negligent --- they were two people who never should have had children, but that there was enough there to find a little redeeming, esp.  when they weren't drinking (and there was backstory as to why they were drinking so much).  But as they say, "One picture is worth a 1000 words" ---- when you read that the parents are throwing things at each other in another of their many brawls, and mom ends up hanging out the window so the kids have to come together to pull her back in to save her life, you read it and use your imagination to visualize what a scene this is, but when you actually SEE this in the film......it leaves a possible bigger impression on the viewer.  Well, it did me.  So I felt the dad was meaner and more abusive in the film.  That makes the film so much more uncomfortable to watch and recommend , and harder to swallow the ending (I don't want to tell what it is, but when you see it, you'll know what I mean).  It's not a movie I ever want to see again ---- and I really don't want to recommend it because it is so hard to watch.  The acting is good, esp. the little kids and Brie Larson (Jeanette). The subject is eye opening.  There's a good theme about being able to accomplish quite a bit if people believe and in you and support you!  (the kids survive because of their tight bonding --- more said about this in the book)   The differences with the book deal with:  Jeanette having a boyfriend throughout the movie, no meeting of grandma on mom's side who left them land and a house on it, mom not being as mentally ill as she came across in the book, the movie going back and forth between present and past much more, movie having  less bonding of the kids in their attempts  to survive, movie having less moments showing Dad's passion/dreams and intelligence.   And there's more:  check out these links if you are interested: http://www.refinery29.com/2017/08/167683/the-glass-castle-movie-book-differences#slide-1 http://www.flare.com/culture/glass-castle-book-vs-movie/, and http://www.historyvshollywood.com/reelfaces/glass-castle/. So yep, there are differences, and if those differences bother you, then you won't like the film as much, but if you've never read the book, I'm still not sure how you will react.  I am anxious to hear what parents would think about this movie ( because it is hard to get past some of the despicable behavior that the parents in the book display when raising their three kids...)  That being said, if what I said above whets your appetite for an uncomfortable film about parenting, see it, and then let me know what you think.  It's different than a lot of what comes out in Hollywood.  This director wrote the script for "Short Term 12" which also starred Brie Larson, and I recommend that one, just not sure about this one.  I'd give it 3.5 stars out of 5.

THE GLASS CASTLE        2017           PG-13           3.5 stars out of 5


Adapted from the novel of the same name, this family drama follows future writer Jeannette Walls, who spends her hardscrabble childhood on the run with her negligent artist mother and storytelling alcoholic father.






Thursday, August 24, 2017

Movie #1363 ........................."Logan Lucky"

Movie #1363 "Logan Lucky" is a great heist film full of lots of twists and turns and  quirky characters.  It's a film that demands your attention from beginning until the very end.  There are lots of humorous moments that help in between the heist setups, and an adorable little girl who is a scene stealer along with Daniel Craig in a small but important role.  I would explain some of the plot but to do that, I'm afraid, would give away some of the clues, so I'm going to cut this critique short and say I highly recommend it, esp. at a time when there's slim pickings out there for a good, solid film!  This is Soderbergh at his best.

LOGAN LUCKY   PG-13              I give it 5 stars out of 5


Amping up the adrenaline with film shot during the real race, this pedal-to the-metal comedy revolves around an impossible heist attempted by two brothers during the Coca-Cola 600 race at Charlotte Motor Speedway in North Carolina.