Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Movie #866 ........................."Short Term 12"

Movie #866 "Short Term 12" refers to a foster care facility , whose members you get to know throughout the film. Besides all the kids, you get to know the two main people who run the facility, who happen to be romantically involved.  As good as she is with dealing with the troubled teens, she is troubled herself and has trouble with intimacy issues.  Then Jada shows up --- and she is forced to deal with these issues head on.  I really loved this film --- it's meaty, natural, well acted (the guy is from Newsroom, and where has this female actress been?  I'll have to check because she is wonderful) and it has just enough humor and drama to keep it intense and flowing steadily to a satisfying ending.  I recommend it to anyone who isn't shy of some grittiness, but would like to see teens working out their problems.














Short Term 122013R96 minutes             I'd give this 5 out of 5 stars
Grace, a compassionate young supervisor at a foster care facility, works with her boyfriend and colleague, Mason, to help at-risk teens. But when a new charge dredges up memories of her own troubled past, Grace's tough exterior begins eroding.

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Movie #865 ........................."Lone Survivor"

Movie #865 "Lone Survivor" is yet another good, tense, but uncomfortable film to watch --- the mantra for this year's oscar nominations.  And the bonus was when I was watching the film,  and it dawned on me that one of my favorite actors was in it --- Ben Foster (I've been a Ben Foster fan since "Liberty Heights" and "The Messenger" -- he's Robin Wright 's new honey, too)  I have to say that I dodge any war films because I just can't watch all the shooting.  I get sick to my stomach and usually have to leave or cover my head or something.  Well, there was an hour set up here, & after that  at least a 30 minute battle (tough to sit through) and then the last 30 minutes getting the lone survivor back (including another attack on an afghani village).  I'm not giving anything away because this is a documented story --- but whether you know a lot about the story or you don't (which I didn't), it is still very riveting ---- the special effects (done by ILM) are astounding, you are right there up close and personal  during the tragic attack (about as real as the Braveheart scenes!).  The first hour is hard to follow ---- I would have liked a bit more spoon-feeding of what exactly their job was and who everyone was ---- but really,  as the mission begins, there are only 4 people to keep track of (because a lot of them look alike, with the facial hair and all) so it wasn't that bad.   During the set up, I have to admit, I might have dozed a bit because it was just walking and hiding --- and obviously,  it was very quiet because they couldn't talk to each other. But after that no one's eyes closed, I bet.  I came away with such respect for the seals who risk their lives like this in Afghanistan, and for the people (in this case Afghanis)  who try to uphold their religious belief to value a human life (and therefore try to save Marcus).  But for sure this comes across very anti-war, too.  It's so futile ---- many times I thought of that last scene in "Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid" with the hundreds of enemies waiting to kill the two people!  This seal Marcus  had some story to tell and I'm glad the director Peter Berg and the very good actors here took this assignment and made the film.  It's a story that deserves to be told!









Lone Survivor2013R     I give this 4 stars out of 5.
Mark Wahlberg stars as Navy SEAL Marcus Luttrel in this action-drama based on an ill-fated real-life mission to bring down a Taliban boss. But the stakes are even higher when Luttrell and his unit are ambushed in the Hindu Kush region of Afghanistan.

Movie #864 .........................."The Hunt"

Movie #864 "The Hunt"  is the one foreign film that is nominated for an Oscar this year that one can stream through netflix, and this one is a good one.  I found it thoroughly engaging.  And it fits with many of the oscar nominees this year ---- good, tense, but uncomfortable to watch --- this one is about a really nice guy, trying to put his life back together after a divorce and losing his teaching job because the school was closed.  He now works as an assistant for a kindergarten class, and due to a very believable chain of events, he is accused of inappropriate behavior with this adorable little girl.  And then the domino effect begins --- it gets to the point that everyone thinks he has attacked every child in this town and he is treated like scum --- he is even told he can't buy groceries in his store --- he is totally alone, except for his own son --- but it gets so dangerous (people throwing things at him and at his house and other atrocities) that he can't even keep his son with him.  The acting is very real --- the moments are done well --- it's filmed well, too.  Bottom line:  it deserves to be nominated, and if the others are better, I can't wait to see them ----- but I probably won't get to for another year or so!  boo!  But I recommend this one, if the topic isn't too disturbing to you.














The Hunt2012R111 minutes             I'd give this 4.5 stars out of 5
In this Oscar nominated film, Lucas has a new job and a girlfriend, and is working on his relationship with his teenage son. But an unfounded accusation of pedophilia changes everything as his community turns against him.

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Movie #863 ........................."Inside Llewyn Davis"

Movie *863 "Inside Llewyn Davis" was another disappointment, but not as much as "Her" (the previous blog).  I wasn't surprised because I have seen all the Coen Brother films and know what to expect in their films.  They have such a good reputation that they have been allowed to dabble in all kinds of genres ---- from the trailer, this one looked like their previous film "The Serious Man," which was well done.  In that film, it is about a Jewish man going through problems in being serious about his religion and living the modern life.  So by following the one man through his trials and tribulations, "Llewyn"  IS  a lot like it , except with less of a final ending on this one ---- it is a week in the life of a very talented 1960s guitarist who is trying to break away from what he considers "lame" hootenanny kind of folk songs --- but he's his own worst enemy, in addition to experiencing a ton of bad luck on the way.  One big thing is that he is going through grief, and the other is he isn't that good at the presentation end of performing --- he feels the music speaks for him.  Well, he did speak to me in that I found some redeeming qualities in him (Dave didn't, so he didn't like the movie much).  And I think that liking Llewyn and understanding where he is coming from helps move the film along.  I got him right away --- I have known people like him --- I get him, and so I felt sorry for him some of the time, but other times I wanted to cuff him in the head because he can be such a jackass.  But Llewyn Davis still speaks through music and that is what made him universal to me --- he feels, sometimes too much, and he doesn't know how to show that --- he's so awkward.  So the film is funny in those parts, but so sad in others.  If you see this, and you'd be up for talking about the ending to me, I'd love to hear your take on it --- it is definitely not one that everyone will embrace.  Oh, and I thought Carey Mulligan and JT were underused here -----wish we would have seen more.  But Goodman is in rare form!  And he's always in a Coen brother film, so he is welcomed in his small bit here.










Inside Llewyn Davis2013R          I would give it 3.5 stars out of 5.
The Coen Brothers helm this chronicle of struggling musician Llewellyn Davis, set during the height of the folk era in the early 1960s. The drama follows Davis through a week of creative highs and lows amid a bleak New York winter.

Movie #862 ........................."Her"

Movie #862 "Her" is the least favorite of all the movies nominated for best film for the Oscars this year.  I just never got into it.  I missed the "wonder" of it ---- that is, I think it is terribly over-rated.  I get the point that in the future that it might be possible to fall in love with your "sure" type phone, but it just seemed silly to me all the way through ----- I couldn't buy it on any level --- as a satire, as sic fi, as a romantic comedy, as a tragicomedy, whatever......but there were some good things in it, one big one was Amy Adams----- this seemed so different from the Amy Adams we have seen before.  She is very timid, but very genuine and intelligent and playful all rolled into one person.  She is definitely the person he should be in love with instead of his phone, so I guess I got that out of the film.  Also that it is ridiculous to fall in love with your phone --- but then I knew that already!  Really, at the end of this movie, Dave and I just looked at each other and wondered why we saw it.  It was nominated, that's why, and we had heard lots of good things about it.  Well, that's not how we felt, so I thought I'd save you time and money if you are on the edge here whether you should see it or not.  I am not a fan.  Now, we did talk about it, but what we said was that it seemed a little like "Lars in the Real Girl" -- except in that film, Lars (the great Ryan Gosling) falls in love with a blow up doll.  But that movie was SO MUCH BETTER than this!!!! However, not everyone can get past the silly idea of someone falling in love with a blow up doll (talking to it, kissing it, etc.) In that film, it is about so much more ---- he's working through some mental illness there.  And people try to help him through it, and the film becomes so inspiring.  This one, you can also see, that he is in need of some counseling --- he writes letters for a career, but it spends more time on how much the sure character changes .......the writing isn't near as good as "lars" --- so my recommendation is to see "Lars" over "Her" --- it's a better film, in my opinion.














Her2013R     I would give it 3 stars out of 5.
In this sci-fi romantic comedy starring Joaquin Phoenix, love comes to a lonely young writer in the sleekest of packages when he finds himself falling for the advanced operating system he purchased to run his life.

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Movie #861 ........................."Entre Nos"


Movie #861 "Entre Nos"was an unbelievably honest portrayal of what it's like to be homeless.  This is based on the writer/actress's mother and what she went through when she immigrated with her daughter and son from Columbia to live in Queens, NY.  She comes to be with her husband, but he leaves them without money, and the rent due, so they have to go around collecting pop cans just to eat.  This is a much grittier "Pursuit of Happyness" (Will Smith's film about being homeless) and make sure if you see this, that you get to the end to find out how these people are doing now.  This is pretty hard to watch in places , and in fact, you are asked to watch how an abortion happens on the streets (using herbs?  I had to google it, because I never heard of that).  Like I said, pretty gritty, but short and full of intensity.











Entre Nos2009NR80 minutes        I give it 4 stars out of 5
Abruptly abandoned by her husband in a country completely foreign to her, Colombian native Mariana (Paola Mendoza) struggles to take care of herself and her two young children on the unforgiving streets of New York City.

Movie #859 ........................."The Newsroom"

Movie #859 "The Newsroom" is an unbelievably well-written and quick-paced t.v. show that has been on HBO, but ,of course, we couldn't see it until we received Season 1 as a gift from one of our alums (thanks, Heather!)  because we don't get HBO. Anyway, what a gem we have been missing, and we can't wait until Season 2 comes out.  We  binge-watched this week Season 1 and loved it.  There wasn't one episode we didn't like in this wonderful expose of what goes on in a newsroom.  However, we weren't surprised we loved this show  due to   the expert writing, the quick pace, the subject matter, the cast, and of course the quality of the show.  It has been criticized for taking real stories in the news and putting them under scrutiny, but that's one of the things we really enjoy about the show.  It has just been announced that the third and final season will start soon and air in the fall -- and though we are sorry it will end, we realize  good writing like this can last  just so long.  So we'll be happy to get  to watch season 2 (if anyone owns it, we'd love to borrow it) and look forward to seeing Season 3. We highly recommend it!











The Newsroom2012TV-MA5 discs   I give this 5 stars out of 5.
Aaron Sorkin created this HBO drama, which centers on a cable news channel trying to return credibility to journalism despite plenty of resistance. Jeff Daniels stars as the ambitious anchor of a nightly news show, and Sam Waterston plays his boss.
Movie #860 "The Lives of Others" (German) takes place from 1984 until the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, a time period I knew very little about.  I really enjoyed this film ----- it reminded me of "The Conversation" with all the sound equipment this man HGW uses in his surveillance of a playwright he suspects of treason (he is in East Berlin, at this time ).  What I really enjoyed about the film is that HGW is such an esoteric person --- he says very little --- he appears very stoic.  You learn that the work is everything.  But then you start to watch the veneer chip away to start to reveal what really makes this man tick, as he listens in on the life of  this playwright and notes:  how much passion this man has for freedom, for search for intelligence, for another person (an actress), for the fine arts.......so much so that he changes his behavior in little increments at first.  I can't say any more because it would give too much of this gem of a film away, but I do warn the watcher a couple of things --- this is a long, slow film ---full of a lot of listening to others' lives (thus the title) , while you try to figure out what makes the lead character tick; it also has a lot of names, but once you get the major ones, it makes it easier to follow and appreciate -- and watch it to the very end, because the ending is very poignant and enjoyable, and it brings things full circle. (this won the best foreign language film oscar in 2007, deservedly so)











The Lives of Others2006R138 minutes       I would give this 4.5 stars out of 5
In 1984, secret police agent Wiesler is assigned to eavesdrop on a successful but possibly disloyal playwright in East Germany. As the lonely Wiesler learns more about the man and his lover, a prominent actress, he becomes fascinated by their lives.

Monday, January 13, 2014

Movie #858 ........................."August Osage County"

Movie #858 "August Osage County" was another one of those films this year ---- I can appreciate its artistry, but not enjoyable to watch.  I didn't feel the same way to the play --- the play was very funny.  Somehow something went wrong here.  When Dave and I talked about it, it was hard to put our fingers on the culprit --- Tracy Letts is the screenwriter, he's the one who originally won the Pulitzer for the script, so what gives?  You've got almost everyone at their top game here, trying to get across these characters, esp. someone Dave and I both admire tremendously, Meryl Streep, who, we know, can be raunchy AND pleasant, and poignant, and funny, and the list goes on.  Julia Roberts didn't seem to ruin it --- it is HER movie, but she also comes to the table with all the talent.  Well, then we found on you tube an illegal taping of the dinner scene with Jeff Perry, Amy Morton, Rondi Reed, and all the other Steppenwolf people we hooted and laughed at in the show, and the lines are the same --- so what was different.  Well, the timing for one........it went faster.  But the other observation is that the lead (Deanna Dunnagan, who went on to win a tony ) took on her family and her hubby with zest!  She almost had a twinkle in her eye with the mean things she was saying --- and she sat at that dinner table like she was about ready to play a ping pong game --- ready to meet the challenges her kids brought up.  That's not how Ms. Streep plays it --- that's not to say it's wrong; it's just different.  So this is more like "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?"  where people verbally cut each other down for two hours --- once again, not so much fun to watch.  Whereas the play was able to do a little of both, so it had a more powerful punch to me!  Dave likens it to "Driving Miss Daisy" -- we don't like her through a lot of the movie because of the mean things she says, but you can tell she has that twinkle in her eye that there's more to her --- and her driver knows it, too, so he just plays with her.  Their conversations come across ever so much more interesting.  So, bottom line, we think it was the director.  And then when we looked at the credits, by golly, you have a very new director --- he has tons of credentials for producer, but not director.  If you haven't seen the play, you might not agree with me, but then I would be remiss if I didn't warn you that once again, this is NOT an enjoyable movie to watch.  It's a pill-popping mother who tears into her kids just waiting for one of them to break, so she can pick at the pieces.  Not a good time to me.















August: Osage County2013R      I would rank this 3.9 stars out of 5.
When their father disappears, three strong-willed women return to their childhood home and to their equally strong-willed mother. As they search for their patriarch, the dysfunctional family members wind up facing difficult truths about themselves.

Movie #857 ........................."Wolf of Wall Street"



Movie #857 "Wolf of Wall Street" was one-of-a-kind.  If you watch it as a dark comedy, and see it as a scathing commentary on our corruption on wall street, then you might overlook its raunchiness for the sake of the powerful comments the film makes.  However,  if you take the plunge and watch this, you might be offended time and time again --- but I think that is the point.  You should be offended by the behavior of these people to the point of saying, "Enough is enough!  We have to do something about it!  We are part of this debauchery if we don't do something about it! "  and then search for what we can do.  Maybe I'm putting too big of a worthiness on to the film, but at least I'm giving a possible  reason why it was such an important project for Scorsese/DiCaprio to see through until the end.  The result?  The movie is really tough to watch, almost impossible to enjoy, but one in which  you can appreciate the artistry involved.  And if that doesn't speak for many of the movies this year, what doesn't?  (well,  I can give a list of a few  movies that I saw this year that won't make the best picture list on Thursday for the oscar noms, but were actually artistic and enjoyable all at the same time,  in my opinion) I felt the push to be" artistic while not being enjoyable"  in a number of movies the critics are touting as the "best" this year.........anyway, one thing I couldn't fault is DiCaprio --- he does the whole gamut here, and this might be his finest work, but here's the big question:  Can you stomach watching it?  I know I won't be taking it out at the lake and showing it to my friends.  Now with him winning the Golden Globe last night, I don't have to be embarrassed by saying that he deserved some accolades for making this picture (and Scorsese, too) because it looks like others agree somewhat with me, but it still is not one I would recommend.  There are other movies he has done that you can watch the acting while enjoying the film --- most of his others, really, because I think he is one of the best actors we have.  So go rent "Gilbert Grape" or "Gangs of New York," or "Boy's Life," (etc.) if you want to see some good acting.  You can skip this one, unless you really want to see something different (but offensive in every way imaginable, including language!)












The Wolf of Wall Street2013R     I give it 3.7 stars out of 5.
Martin Scorcese's high-rolling Wall Street drama is based on the memoirs of stockbroker Jordan Belfort, whose giddy career -- involving audacious scams and confrontations with the FBI and other agencies -- ended in federal prison.

Movie #856 ........................."We're the Millers"

Movie #856 "We're the Millers" I watched the other night (red boxed it) and was a bit disappointed.  I had seen the opening set up in the movie theatre one day when I was early to another movie, and so I had it on my list to complete it some day.  Well, the film started out pretty well, dumb premise but the cast seemed winning so I was willing to suspend belief as long as it was laughable, but it crashed and burned quite quickly.......until it got way too long and had one too many fight scenes.  Too many high points for me.  The ending was okay; it was the getting there that I thought was not-so-good (okay, I'm holding back, downright awful in some parts)  What did they pay for Anniston to be in this?  I bet she was a bit disappointed, too.  It's cast well; it's just an awful script --- that is funny in just a few places.  Not worth a recommendation, in my estimation.  And it's definitely an R.














We're the Millers2013R110 minutes     I gave it 2.9 stars out of 5.
When a small-time pot dealer gets mugged, he needs to find a way to pay back his supplier. Agreeing to smuggle in a major stash from Mexico, he rounds up a fake family to act as his cover, and they head for the border in an RV.

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Movie #855 ........................."Pipe Dream"

Movie #855 "Pipe Dream" is a nice romantic comedy which is stolen by Mary Louise Parker --- the best part of the film.  She plays the aspiring screenwriter who has a dream to have one of her films made ---- enter a plumber (thus the title) who feels belitted by everyone so he decides he would make up that he is a movie director ------ie. both dreams come true and they find themselves working on a film together.  I really never warmed up to the male lead (not sure why), but Mary Louise is magnificent.  I have seen her on stage, on t.v. and in other movies, but this is one of her best pieces of work.  Loved the film, due to her.  I also like all the ins and outs of filmmaking being covered here, too.  More so than you might like, but there's enough here so that lots of people who like romantic comedies would enjoy this.








Pipe Dream2002R94 minutes     I would give this movie 3.9 out of 5 stars
After having a one-night-stand with an aspiring screenwriter, a New York City plumber, frustrated about the way his vocation is perceived by women, steals the writer's script and poses as a director to improve his chances in the dating arena.

Movie #854 ........................."Columbus Circle"

Movie #854 "Columbus Circle" has some problems but on the whole, it is a good mystery.  The main fault to me was Selma Blair --- she hasn't been my favorite in most films that she's been in, and this is no different.  Her creepiness was almost enough to have me turn off the film, but I pursued it, and I'm glad I did, because I didn't guess the surprises that were in the script.  And I like Giovanni Ribisi, if he were reciting the phone book probably.  Kevin Pollack and Jason Lee had something to do with the script and getting this film done, so hats off to them both.  The set piece is  a very exclusive place on Columbus Circle in NYC, and that was fun to watch that place, like the motel in "Rear Window."  Now, it isn't near as good as "Rear Window," but it still kept me watching until the end, and leaving me satisfied with the mystery part of the story.













Columbus Circle2011PG-1386 minutes    I would give this movie 3.8 stars out of 5
When her next door neighbor is murdered, an agoraphobic Manhattan heiress who hasn't left her apartment in decades finds herself forced to deal with the detective investigating the case and the new couple who move into the dead woman's apartment.

Monday, January 6, 2014

Movie #853 ........................."Saving Mr. Banks"


Movie #853 "Saving Mr. Banks" --- I loved this film.  I wasn't sure I would, being so close to the movie "Mary Poppins" and to the whole Disney world (if you don't know me, then you wouldn't know this, but I have a bedroom/bathroom in two houses dedicated to the wonderful world of Disney, which I have loved since I started to talk (that's a long time ago!)  Anyway, then put that together with loving the two main actors, I was so hoping this would work, but my pessimistic side of me (which I've been told is huge) said there was no way this would be that good.  But it is.  I don't think critics have reacted as gushy as I am about to, but then again, they don't know every word in the Mary Poppins musical or have bathrooms/bedrooms decorated in Mickey, either.  So here goes.  I loved that there are two stories here ---- if the film were just about Pamela and Walt, it would have run only about 1/2 the film's length.  Know that their scenes are woven in between another story --- that of "Pamela's" early life, with her drunken but terribly creative "Da".  So what's created here is a mystery ----- and I love mysteries.  The mystery is why P.L. Travers wrote this book, and why she is so stubborn about not having it touched by the "tinkle bell, magical" Mr. Disney.  What a wonderful storyline.  I loved how it went back and forth, and how we didn't know everything mostly because she herself goes through an epiphany, and we are right there for it.  There were several scenes I shed some tears, not in sadness but because it was so good, so creative.  And this year, there was very little of that at the theatre.  The film manages also to somehow bring out the magic of the Mary Poppins books AND the Disney people, who all seem so "Heigh Ho, Heigh Ho, it's off to work we go!"  Which probably isn't true at all, but it's what I love about the experiences I've had with Disney.  It's that "Spoonful of Sugar" attitude they seem to have that draws you in ...........and how can  you not be drawn in, when you see the looks on the kids' faces all around you!  It's wonderful just because of what it is to kids all over the world!  It's then I say I don't care what a big moneymaking corporation Disney is........if they hire people like Paul Giametti who can singlehandedly melt the heart of a crusty lady from England with just being who he is, I say that it is something magical.  And if a movie can bring that across, I can then say the film  is magical.  You might not think so, but then again, you haven't memorized every song in the Poppins' album and decorated your bathroom/bedroom with Disney products.  I can dream, can't I?














Saving Mr. Banks2013PG-13                 I give this 5 out of 5 stars.
When Walt Disney sets his sights on obtaining the rights to the children's classic "Mary Poppins," he reaches out to the book's author, P.L. Travers, only to find that she proves a tough nut to crack.

Movie #852 ........................."Detachment"

Movie #852 "Detachment" --- well, this was another one tough to watch, esp. for a teacher, since it is about a substitute teacher.  It's not a movie you will understand everything that happens, but know that going into it............you have to piece stuff together.  Brody is taping his memoirs, so he goes back in time...........he writes in a composition book --- it works for him to "feel" more about life through his writing, so he tries to give these composition books to everyone he tries to get close to, so they can also "feel" more --- but it doesn't work that way for everyone.  Wow!  When I look back, all the people in the film, including Brody, have baggage.............no one has an easy life.  So as a teacher, I hurt so much watching these kids struggling.  I'm not sure why the film didn't follow his successes in the classroom, but followed one failure and one success OUTSIDE of class, but that was the writer/director's plan, I guess.  I wanted to see more IN the classroom --- and how he reached the kids, when so many others don't (and oh, there's an array of actors playing the rest of the faculty, including Lucy Liu (who has a wonderful scene in here where she just loses it with a kid who doesn't seem to care!), Blythe Danner, James Caan, Bryan Cranston, William Petersen, Christina Hendricks, Tim Blake Nelson, and principal Marcia Gay Harden.  All the teachers seem beaten down by the kids and so they feel nothing but "detachment" --- a bitter pill to take every day going in to work.  The film wallows more in what happened to him and his childhood and why he is the way HE is, instead of what's going on in the school.  For that reason, I think a majority of people watching this might think that all schools run this way, so I wouldn't recommend it to them.  But if you are interested in seeing the woes of inner-city schools, and one individual teacher trying to help, then this might serve you right.  It is an individual character study of someone who "feels" detached but knows it is wrong to be that way as a teacher, as a human being, esp. one who works with kids.  He learns the value of mentoring, even if his life hasn't been stellar.










Detachment2011NR97 minutes        I give this 3 stars out of 5.
When a substitute teacher takes a new assignment at an inner-city school, he finds himself becoming involved in the lives of his colleagues and students. At home, he houses a young prostitute and meditates on what happened to his mother.